PicoTrace is a spin-off company, founded by members of the Faculty of Geosciences of the University of Göttingen, Germany. Our University has a well known tradition. This document, Chapter 9 . Compliance with these policies and procedures must be fully documented and be subject to periodic internal audit. It has been investigated whether Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761) induces apoptosis of oral cavity cancer cells and attempted to characterize the apoptotic pathway. Franklin Gothic Book,Regular"Public 2010 and Greater Extract File Specification Page of. Some dog foods can cause aggression and hyperactivity, skin complaints bad breath, and numerous other problems. This tells you what you should consider. With innovations in new target and/or disease specific drug development, 40% of the new chemical entities coming out of drug discovery groups at. Type of Publication: Guideline; Effective Date: April 2014; Audiences: Banks / BHC / T&L / CRA; The Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) for banks. Hypericum perforatum; Scientific classification; Kingdom: Plantae (unranked): Angiosperms (unranked): Eudicots (unranked): Rosids: Order: Malpighiales: Family. This list is not intended to provide a series of tests that a product or group of related products must pass to be eligible for inclusion in the trading book. Rather, the list provides a minimum set of key points that must be addressed by the policies and procedures for overall management of a firm's trading book: The activities the institution considers to be trading and as constituting part of the trading book for regulatory capital purposes; The extent to which an exposure can be marked- to- market daily by reference to an active, liquid two- way market; For exposures that are marked- to- model, the extent to which the institution can: Identify the material risks of the exposure; Hedge the material risks of the exposure and the extent to which hedging instruments would have an active, liquid two- way market; Derive reliable estimates for the key assumptions and parameters used in the model. The extent to which the institution can and is required to generate valuations for the exposure that can be validated externally in a consistent manner; The extent to which legal restrictions or other operational requirements would impede the institution's ability to effect an immediate liquidation of the exposure; The extent to which the institution is required to, and can, actively risk manage the exposure within its trading operations; and The extent to which the institution may transfer risk or exposures between the banking and the trading books and criteria for such transfers. There must be clearly defined policies and procedures for the active management of the position that establish, at a minimum, a structure for trading activities under which: positions are managed at a trading desk, position limits are set and monitored for appropriateness, dealers have the autonomy to enter into or manage the position within agreed limits and according to the agreed strategy, positions are marked to market at least daily (with the results reflected in the institution's earnings statement), and when marking to model the parameters are assessed on a daily basis, positions are reported to senior management as an integral part of the institution's risk management process, and the positions are actively monitored, using market information sources, with regard to their market liquidity, or with regard to the ability of the positions or the portfolio risk profile to be hedged. There must be clearly defined policies and procedures to monitor the positions against the institution's trading strategy, including the monitoring of turnover and stale positions in the trading book. Confused about supplements? Join our FREE supplement course and end the confusion.A capital charge for failed transactions should be calculated in accordance with Chapter 4 . With respect to unsettled securities, commodities, and foreign exchange transactions that are not processed through a delivery- versus- payment (Dv. P) or payment- versus- payment (Pv. P) mechanism, institutions should calculate a capital charge as set forth in Chapter 4 . The trading book treatment of credit derivatives that reference loans raises issues that are not explicitly addressed in this guideline. Where such instruments are included in the trading book for capital purposes, OSFI may, based on its review of the justification provided, increase the institution's capital requirements for this activity if the determination of price or liquidity presents additional risks. Institutions may use their internal models to determine the amount of capital required if such models meet OSFI's requirements and they have been approved for the credit derivatives portfolio. Independent price verification is distinct from daily mark- to- market. This adjustment may be in addition to any changes to the value of the position required for financial reporting purposes and should be designed to reflect the illiquidity of the position. OSFI expects institutions to consider the need for an adjustment to a position's valuation to reflect current illiquidity whether the position is marked to market using market prices or observable inputs, third- party valuations or marked to model. Reduced liquidity may have arisen from market events. Additionally, close- out prices for concentrated positions and/or stale positions should be considered in establishing the adjustment. Institutions must consider all relevant factors when determining the appropriateness of the adjustment for less liquid positions. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the amount of time it would take to hedge out the position/risks within the position, the average volatility of bid/offer spreads, the availability of independent market quotes (number and identity of market makers), the average and volatility of trading volumes (including trading volumes during periods of market stress), market concentrations, the aging of positions, the extent to which valuation relies on marking- to- model, and the impact of other model risks not included in the prior paragraph. Netting of positions within the specific risk category is permitted under the conditions described below. No capital is required for specific risk for either side of a position in cases where the values of the two legs (i. This occurs where a long cash position is hedged by a credit default swap or a credit linked note (or vice versa) and there is an exact match in terms of the reference obligation, the maturity of both the reference obligation and the credit derivative, and the currency to the underlying exposure. To the extent that a transaction meeting the requirements of this paragraph transfers risk (i. The position is captured under a) or paragraph 7. Footnote 1. 3 between the credit protection and the underlying asset. The position is captured under paragraph. For this calculation, offsetting of long and short positions is permitted for tranched positions in identical issues with identical attachment and detachment points, and underlying reference names, etc. During a transitional period ending 3. December 2. 01. 3, the institution may exclude positions in securitization instruments (and n- th- to- default credit derivatives) which are not included in the correlation trading portfolio from the above calculation, according to an equivalent treatment, and determine the specific risk capital charge as follows: The institution computes (i) the total specific risk capital charge that would apply just to the net long positions in securitization instruments in the trading book, and (ii) the total specific risk capital charge that would apply just to the net short positions in securitization instruments in the trading book. The larger of these total amounts is then the specific risk capital charge for securitization instruments in the trading book. This calculation must be undertaken separately from the calculation for the correlation trading portfolio. A 1. 25. 0% risk weight (1. Chapter 7 . The operational requirements for the recognition of external credit assessments outlined in paragraph 5. The maturity method uses a maturity- ladder that incorporates a series of . A separate maturity ladder must be constructed for each currency in which an institution has significant positions, and capital requirements must be calculated for each currency separately. No offsetting of positions is permitted between different currencies in which positions are significant. Positions in currencies that are not significant may be combined into a common maturity ladder, with the net long or short position of each currency entered in the applicable time band. To calculate the general market risk charge, the institution distributes the long or short position (at current market value) of each debt instrument and other source of interest rate exposure, including derivatives, into the time- bands and three zones of the maturity ladder outlined in Table V. The summed positions are multiplied by the appropriate risk- weight factor (reflecting the price sensitivity of the positions to changes in interest rates) to determine the risk- weighted long and short market risk positions for each time- band. Capital requirements, referred to as the yield curve risk charge, are assessed to allow for the imperfect correlation of interest rates along the yield curve. The matched weighted position in each zone is multiplied by the percentage risk factor corresponding to the relevant zone. The matched weighted positions between zones are multiplied by the percentage risk factor corresponding to the relevant adjacent zones. The unmatched weighted long (short) position in zone 1 may offset the unmatched weighted short (long) position in zone 2. The extent to which unmatched weighted positions in zones 1 and 2 are offset is described as the matched weighted position between zones 1 and 2. Then, any residual unmatched weighted long (short) positions in zone 2 may then be matched by offsetting unmatched weighted short (long) positions between zone 2 and zone 3. Footnote 1. 8 Then, any residual unmatched weighted long (short) positions in zone 1 may then be matched by offsetting unmatched weighted long (short) positions in zone 3. The extent to which the unmatched positions in zones 1 and 3 are offsetting is described as the matched weighted positions between zones 1 and 3. The yield curve risk charges, like the basis risk charges, are absolute values that are summed and included as an element of the general market risk capital requirement. TABLE VI Zonal Disallowances Zone Time- Band Within the zone Between adjacent zones Between zones 1- 3 1 0- 1 month 4. The net position charge for interest rate position risk in a currency is the absolute value of the sum of the weighted net open positions in each time band. The amount to be included is the market value of the principal amount of the underlying instrument or of the notional underlying.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2017
Categories |